Related questions with answers
Jorge’s Appliance Corp. was a new
retail seller of appliances in Sunrise City. Because of its inno-
vative sales techniques and financing, Jorge’s attracted many
customers. As a result, the appliance department of No-Glow
Department Store, a large chain store with a great deal of buy-
ing power, lost a substantial number of sales. No-Glow told
a number of appliance manufacturers from whom it made
large-volume purchases that if they continued to sell to Jorge’s,
No-Glow would stop buying from them. The manufacturers
immediately stopped selling appliances to Jorge’s. Jorge’s filed
a suit against No-Glow and the manufacturers, claiming that
their actions constituted an antitrust violation. No-Glow and
the manufacturers were able to prove that Jorge’s was a small
retailer with a small market share. They claimed that because
the relevant market was not substantially affected, they were
not guilty of restraint of trade. Discuss fully whether there was
an antitrust violation.
Solution
VerifiedIn this question, we are asked whether an antitrust law violation had occurred or not.
Create a free account to view solutions
Create a free account to view solutions
Recommended textbook solutions


Business Law: Text and Cases
14th Edition•ISBN: 9781305967250Frank Cross, Kenneth Clarkson, Roger LeRoy Miller
Statistics for Business and Economics
14th Edition•ISBN: 9781337901062 (1 more)David R. Anderson, Dennis J. Sweeney, James J Cochran, Jeffrey D. Camm, Thomas A. Williams
Cambridge IGCSE Business Studies
4th Edition•ISBN: 9781444176582Karen Borrington, Peter StimpsonMore related questions
1/4
1/7