Related questions with answers

Northwest Aircraft Industries (NAI) was founded 4545 years ago by Jay Preston as a small machine shop producing machined parts for the aircraft industry, which is prominent in the Seattle/Tacoma area of Washington. By the end of its first decade, NAI's annual sales had reached $15\$ 15 million, almost exclusively under government contracts. The next 3030 years brought slow but steady growth as cost-reimbursement government contracts continued to be the main source of revenue. Realizing that NAI could not depend on government contracts for long-term growth and stability, Drew Preston, son of the founder and now president of the company, began planning for diversified commercial growth. As a result of these efforts, three years ago NAI had succeeded in reducing the ratio of government contract sales to 5050 percent of total sales.

Traditionally, the costs of the Material-Handling Department have been allocated to direct material as a percentage of direct-material dollar value. This was adequate when the majority of the manufacturing was homogeneous and related to government contracts. Recently, however, government auditors have rejected some proposals, stating that "the amount of Material-Handling Department costs allocated to these proposals is disproportionate to the total effort involved."

Kara Lindley, the newly hired cost-accounting manager, was asked by the manager of the Government Contracts Unit, Paul Anderson, to find a more equitable method of allocating Material-Handling Department costs to the user departments. Her review has revealed the following information.

  • The majority of the direct-material purchases for government contracts are high-dollar, low-volume purchases, while commercial materials represent low-dollar, high-volume purchases.

  • Administrative departments such as marketing, finance and administration, human resources, and maintenance also use the services of the Material-Handling Department on a limited basis but have never been charged in the past for material-handling costs.

  • One purchasing agent with a direct phone line is assigned exclusively to purchasing high-dollar, low-volume material for government contracts at an annual salary of $36,000\$ 36,000. Employee benefits are estimated to be 2020 percent of the annual salary. The annual dedicated phone line costs are $2,800\$ 2,800.

The components of the Material-Handling Department's budget for 2020x11, as proposed by Lindley's predecessor, are as follows:

 Payroll $180,000 Employee benefits 36,000 Telephone 38,000 Other utilities 22,000 Materials and supplies 6,000 Depreciation 6,000 Direct-material budget:  Government contracts 2,006,000 Commercial products 874,000\begin{array}{lr} \text{ Payroll } & \$ \quad 180,000 \\ \text{ Employee benefits } & 36,000 \\ \text{ Telephone } & 38,000 \\ \text{ Other utilities } & 22,000 \\ \text{ Materials and supplies } & 6,000 \\ \text{ Depreciation } & 6,000 \\ \text{ Direct-material budget: } & \\ \text{ Government contracts } & 2,006,000 \\ \text{ Commercial products } & 874,000 \end{array}

Lindley has estimated the number of purchase orders to be processed in 2020x11 to be as follows:

 Government contracts* 80,000 Commercial products 156,000 Marketing 1,800 Finance and administration 2,700 Human resources 500 Maintenance 1,000 Total 242,000\begin{array}{lr} \text{ Government contracts* } & 80,000 \\ \text{ Commercial products } & 156,000 \\ \text{ Marketing } & 1,800 \\ \text{ Finance and administration } & 2,700 \\ \text{ Human resources } & 500 \\ \text{ Maintenance } & \underline{ 1,000 } \\ \text{ Total } & \underline{ \underline { 242,000 }} \\ \end{array}

*Exclusive of high-dollar, low-volume materials.

Lindley recommended to Anderson that material-handling costs be allocated on a per-purchase order basis. Anderson realizes and accepts that the company has been allocating to government contracts more material-handling costs than can be justified. However, the implication of Lindley's analysis could be a decrease in his unit's earnings and, consequently, a cut in his annual bonus. Anderson told Lindley to "adjust" her numbers and modify her recommendation so that the results will be more favorable to the Government Contracts Unit.

Being new in her position, Lindley is not sure how to proceed. She feels ambivalent about Anderson's instructions and suspects his motivation. To complicate matters for Lindley, Preston has asked her to prepare a three-year forecast of the Government Contracts Unit's results, and she believes that the newly recommended allocation method would provide the most accurate data. However, this would put her in direct opposition to Anderson's directives.

Lindley has assembled the following data to project the material-handling costs.

  • Total direct-material costs increase 2.52.5 percent per year.

  • Material-handling costs remain the same percentage of direct-material costs.

  • Direct government costs (payroll, employee benefits, and direct phone line) remain constant.

  • The number of purchase orders increases 55 percent per year.

  • The ratio of government purchase orders to total purchase orders remains at 3333 percent.

  • In addition, she has assumed that government material in the future will be 7070 percent of total material.

1.1. Calculate the material-handling rate that would have been used by Kara Lindley's predecessor at Northwest Aircraft Industries.

2.2. a.a. Calculate the revised material-handling costs to be allocated on a per-purchase-order basis.

b.b. Discuss why purchase orders might be a more reliable cost driver than the dollar amount of direct material.

3.3. Calculate the difference due to the change to the new method of allocating material-handling costs to government contracts.

4.4. Prepare a forecast of the cumulative dollar impact over a three-year period from 2020x11 through 2020x33 of Kara Lindley's recommended change for allocating Material-Handling Department costs to the Government Contracts Unit. Round all calculations to the nearest whole number.

5.5. Referring to the standards of ethical conduct for management accountants:

a.a. Discuss why Kara Lindley has an ethical conflict.

b.b. Identify several steps that Lindley could take to resolve the ethical conflict.

See Table down below showing financial statement data and stock price data for Mydeco Corp.

a. What were Mydeco's gross margins each year?

b. Comparing Mydeco's gross margin, EBIT margin, and net profit margin in 20122012 to 20162016, which margins improved?

2012–2016 Financial Statement Data and Stock Price Data for Mydeco Corp

Mydeco Corp. 2012–2016 \hspace{30mm} (All data as of fiscal year end; in million)million)

Income statement20122013201420152016Revenue401.9361.6429.6513.6602.6Cost of Goods Sold(192.1)(175.4)(207.1)(248.3)(295.8)Gross Profit209.8186.2222.5265.3306.8Sales and Marketing(65.0)(64.4)(84.3)(104.9)(121.1)Administration(61.8)(57.1)(59.0)(66.9)(79.8)Depreciation & Amortization(27.5)(26.3)(32.5)(38.3)(40.1)EBIT55.538.446.755.265.8Interest Income (Expense)(32.4)(31.8)(32.0)(37.0)(40.9)Pretax Income23.16.614.718.224.9Income Tax(8.1)(2.3)(5.1)(6.4)(8.7)Net Income15.04.39.611.816.2Shares outstanding (millions)56.856.856.856.856.8Earnings per share$0.26$0.08$0.17$0.21$0.29Balance Sheet20122013201420152016AssetsCash49.468.091.780.483.6Accounts Receivable87.670.669.377.484.2Inventory33.532.227.330.235.8Total Current Assets170.5170.8188.3188.0203.6Net Property, Plant & Equip.244.3243.3306.1349.6347.9Goodwill & Intangibles365.5365.5365.5365.5365.5Total Assets780.3779.6859.9903.1917.0Liabilities & Stockholders’ EquityAccounts Payable18.818.822.427.130.3Accrued Compensation7.66.37.57.79.4Total Current Liabilities26.425.129.934.839.7Long-term Debt498.9498.9572.2597.5597.5Total Liabilities525.3524602.1632.3637.2Stockholders’ Equity255.0255.6257.8270.8279.8Total Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity780.3779.6859.9903.1917.0Statement of Cash Flows20122013201420152016Net Income15.04.39.611.816.2Depreciation & Amortization27.526.332.538.340.1Chg. in Accounts Receivable3.917.01.3(8.1)(6.8)Chg. in Inventory(2.9)1.34.9(2.9)(5.6)Chg. in Payables & Accrued Comp.1.7(1.3)4.84.94.9Cash from Operations45.247.653.144.048.8Capital Expenditures(26.6)(23.8)(97.5)(75.4)(40.0)Cash from Investing Activities(26.6)(23.8)(97.5)(75.4)(40.0)Dividends Paid(5.2)(5.2)(5.2)(5.2)(5.6)Sale (or purchase) of stockDebt Issuance (Pay Down)73.325.3Cash from Financing Activities(5.2)(5.2)68.120.1(5.6)Change in Cash13.418.623.7(11.3)3.2Mydeco Stock Price$7.02$3.55$5.86$8.33$11.57\begin{array}{lccccc} \text{Income statement} & 2012 & 2013 & 2014 & 2015 & 2016 \\ \text{Revenue} & 401.9 & 361.6 & 429.6 & 513.6 & 602.6 \\ \underline{\text{Cost of Goods Sold}} & (192.1) & (175.4) & (207.1) & (248.3) & (295.8)\\ \text{Gross Profit} & 209.8 & 186.2 & 222.5 & 265.3 & 306.8\\ \text{Sales and Marketing} & (65.0) & (64.4) & (84.3) & (104.9) & (121.1)\\ \text{Administration} & (61.8) & (57.1) & (59.0) & (66.9) & (79.8)\\ \underline{\text{Depreciation $\And$ Amortization}} & (27.5) & (26.3) & (32.5) & (38.3) & (40.1)\\ \text{EBIT} & 55.5 & 38.4 & 46.7 & 55.2 & 65.8\\ \underline{\text{Interest Income (Expense)}} & (32.4) & (31.8) & (32.0) & (37.0) & (40.9)\\ \text{Pretax Income} & 23.1 & 6.6 & 14.7 & 18.2 & 24.9\\ \underline{\text{Income Tax}} & (8.1) & (2.3) & (5.1) & (6.4) & (8.7)\\ \text{Net Income} & 15.0 & 4.3 & 9.6 & 11.8 & 16.2\\ \text{Shares outstanding (millions)} & 56.8 & 56.8 & 56.8 & 56.8 & 56.8\\ \text{Earnings per share} & \$0.26 & \$0.08 & \$0.17 & \$0.21 & \$0.29\\ \text{Balance Sheet} & 2012 & 2013 & 2014 & 2015 & 2016\\ \text{Assets}\\ \text{Cash} & 49.4 & 68.0 & 91.7 & 80.4 & 83.6\\ \text{Accounts Receivable} & 87.6 & 70.6 & 69.3 & 77.4 & 84.2\\ \text{Inventory} & 33.5 & 32.2 & 27.3 & 30.2 & 35.8\\ \text{Total Current Assets} & 170.5 & 170.8 & 188.3 & 188.0 & 203.6\\ \text{Net Property, Plant $\And$ Equip.} & 244.3 & 243.3 & 306.1 & 349.6 & 347.9\\ \text{Goodwill $\And$ Intangibles} & 365.5 & 365.5 & 365.5 & 365.5 & 365.5\\ \text{Total Assets} & 780.3 & 779.6 & 859.9 & 903.1 & 917.0\\ \text{Liabilities $\And$ Stockholders’ Equity}\\ \text{Accounts Payable} & 18.8 & 18.8 & 22.4 & 27.1 & 30.3\\ \text{Accrued Compensation} & 7.6 & 6.3 & 7.5 & 7.7 & 9.4\\ \text{Total Current Liabilities} & 26.4 & 25.1 & 29.9 & 34.8 & 39.7\\ \text{Long-term Debt} & 498.9 & 498.9 & 572.2 & 597.5 & 597.5\\ \text{Total Liabilities} & 525.3 & 524 & 602.1 & 632.3 & 637.2\\ \text{Stockholders’ Equity} & 255.0 & 255.6 & 257.8 & 270.8 & 279.8\\ \text{Total Liabilities $\And$ Stockholders’ Equity} & 780.3 & 779.6 & 859.9 & 903.1 & 917.0\\ \text{Statement of Cash Flows} & 2012 & 2013 & 2014 & 2015 & 2016\\ \text{Net Income} & 15.0 & 4.3 & 9.6 & 11.8 & 16.2\\ \text{Depreciation $\And$ Amortization} & 27.5 & 26.3 & 32.5 & 38.3 & 40.1\\ \text{Chg. in Accounts Receivable} & 3.9 & 17.0 & 1.3 & (8.1) & (6.8)\\ \text{Chg. in Inventory} & (2.9) & 1.3 & 4.9 & (2.9) & (5.6)\\ \underline{\text{Chg. in Payables $\And$ Accrued Comp.}} & 1.7 & (1.3) & 4.8 & 4.9 & 4.9\\ \text{Cash from Operations} & 45.2 & 47.6 & 53.1 & 44.0 & 48.8\\ \underline{\text{Capital Expenditures}} & (26.6) & (23.8) & (97.5) & (75.4) & (40.0)\\ \text{Cash from Investing Activities} & (26.6) & (23.8) & (97.5) & (75.4) & (40.0)\\ \text{Dividends Paid} & (5.2) & (5.2) & (5.2) & (5.2) & (5.6)\\ \text{Sale (or purchase) of stock} & — & — & — & — & —\\ \underline{\text{Debt Issuance (Pay Down)}} & — & — & 73.3 & 25.3 & —\\ \text{Cash from Financing Activities} & (5.2) & (5.2) & 68.1 & 20.1 & (5.6)\\ \text{Change in Cash} & 13.4 & 18.6 & 23.7 & (11.3) & 3.2\\ \text{Mydeco Stock Price} & \$7.02 & \$3.55 & \$5.86 & \$8.33 & \$11.57\\ \end{array}

$

One of the most famous presidential elections (from a statistician's point of view) is the 1936 contest between incumbent Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) and Republican challenger Alf Landon. The notoriety of the election comes from the fact that polling done by Literary Digest suggested that Landon would win by a 3 to 2 margin. However, Roosevelt actually crushed Landon in the general election. After the election, author and editor David Lawrence studied the vote. Lawrence asked the following question: "To what extent was the campaign a reflection of a new trend in American politics, a trend in which the federal government's paternalistic interest in the citizen brought an amazing reward to the party in power?"As part of FDR's New Deal policies to help get the United States out of the Great Depression, the federal government created the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA). The AAA tried to force higher prices for commodities by paying farmers not to farm and not to bring cattle to market. To determine whether farm subsidies may have played a role in the election results, Lawrence looked at election results in 2052 counties. He segmented the counties based on AAA funding between 1934 and 1935 as follows: High-funded AAA counties received $500,000 or more in AAA money. Medium-funded AAA counties received between$100,000 and $500,000 in AAA money. Low-funded AAA counties received some AAA money, but less than$100,000. Counties with no AAA-fund did not receive any funds. Treat the following data as a random sample of voters within each county type. The results are based on the election results in the various counties.

 High-FundedMedium-FundedLow-FundedNo FundingRoosevelt745641513411London498484437465\begin{matrix} \text{ } & \text{High-Funded} & \text{Medium-Funded} & \text{Low-Funded} & \text{No Funding}\\ \text{Roosevelt} & \text{745} & \text{641} & \text{513} & \text{411}\\ \text{London} & \text{498} & \text{484} & \text{437} & \text{465}\\ \end{matrix}

(a) Do the data suggest that the level of funding received by counties through the AAA is associated with the candidate? Use the $\alpha$=0.05 level of significance. (b) Construct a conditional distribution of candidate by level of AAA funding and draw a bar graph.
Question

Sherene Nili manages a company that makes wedding gowns. She produces both a custom product that is made to order and a standard product that is sold in bridal salons. Her accountant prepared the following forecasted income statement for March, which is a busy month:

Custom Dresses Standard Dresses Total
Number of dresses 10 20 30
Sales revenue $50,000 $30,000 $80,000
Materials $10,000 $8,000 $18,000
Labor 20,000 9,000 29,000
Machine depreciation 600 300 900
Rent 4,200 2,800 7,000
Heat and light 1,000 600 1,600
Other production costs 2,800
Marketing and administration 7,700
Total costs 67,000
Operating profit $13,000

Ms. Nili already has orders for the 10 custom dresses refl ected in the March forecasted income statement. The depreciation charges are for machines used in the respective product lines. Machines depreciate at the rate of$1 per hour based on hours used, so these are variable costs. In March, cutting and sewing machines are expected to operate for 900 hours, of which 600 hours will be used to make custom dresses. The rent is for the building space, which has been leased for several years at $7,000 per month. The rent, heat, and light are allocated to the product lines based on the amount of fl oor space occupied.

A valued customer, who is a wedding consultant, has asked Ms. Nili for a special favor. This customer has a client who wants to get married in early April. Ms. Nili’s company is working at capacity and would have to give up some other business to make this dress. She can’t renege on custom orders already agreed to, but she can reduce the number of standard dresses produced in March to 10. Ms. Nili would lose permanently the opportunity to make up the lost production of standard dresses because she has no unused capacity for the foreseeable future. The customer is willing to pay$24,000 for the special order. Materials and labor for the order will cost $6,000 and$10,000, respectively. The special order would require 140 hours of machine time. Ms. Nili’s company would save 150 hours of machine time from the standard dress business given up. Rent, heat and light, and other production costs would not be affected by the special order.

Required
What is the minimum price Ms. Nili should accept to take the special order?

Solution

Verified
Answered 1 year ago
Answered 1 year ago
Step 1
1 of 41

In this exercise, we will determine the minimum price Ms. Nili should accept to take the special order.

Create an account to view solutions

Create an account to view solutions

More related questions

1/4