Related questions with answers
Sue Ann Apolinar hired a guide through Arkansas Valley Adventures, LLC, for a rafting excursion on the Arkansas River. At the outfitter’s office, Apolinar signed a release that detailed potential hazards and risks, including “overturning,” “unpredictable currents,” “obstacles” in the water, and “drowning.” The release clearly stated that her signature discharged Arkansas Valley from liability for all claims arising in connection with the trip. On the river, while attempting to maneuver around a rapid, the raft capsized. The current swept Apolinar into a logjam where, despite eorts to save her, she drowned. Her son, Jesus Espinoza, Jr., Filed a suit in a federal district court against the rafting company, alleging negligence. What are the arguments for and against enforcing the release that Apolinar signed? Discuss. [Espinoza v. Arkansas Valley Adventures, LLC, 809 F.3d 1150 (10th Cir. 2016)] (See Legality.)
Solution
VerifiedIn this problem, we are asked to determine the contentions one could have for and against enforcing a release of liability.
Create an account to view solutions
Create an account to view solutions
Recommended textbook solutions



Business Law: Text and Cases
14th Edition•ISBN: 9781305967250Frank Cross, Kenneth Clarkson, Roger LeRoy Miller
Cambridge IGCSE Business Studies
4th Edition•ISBN: 9781444176582Karen Borrington, Peter StimpsonMore related questions
1/4
1/7