Related questions with answers
William Prout (1815) proposed that all other atoms are built up of hydrogen atoms, suggesting that all elements should have integral atomic masses based on an atomic mass of one for hydrogen. This hypothesis appeared discredited by the discovery of atomic masses, such as for magnesium and for chlorine. In terms of modern knowledge, explain why Prout's hypothesis is actually quite reasonable.
Solution
VerifiedThe element hydrogen contains one proton, one electron, and no neutrons. And the mass of an electron is almost zero which is negligible, so the mass of hydrogen is the same as the mass of proton. Note that in every atom, the number of protos is equal to its atomic number.
So, the . And since the mass of hydrogen atom is the same as the mass of proton, the statement in the given "all elements should have integral atomic masses based on an atomic mass of one for hydrogen" is somewhat reasonable even if all other atoms are not built up of hydrogen atom.
Create a free account to view solutions
Create a free account to view solutions
Recommended textbook solutions

Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change
7th Edition•ISBN: 9780073511177 (2 more)Patricia Amateis, Silberberg
General Chemistry: Principles and Modern Applications
11th Edition•ISBN: 9780132931281 (4 more)Carey Bissonnette, F. Geoffrey Herring, Jeffrey D. Madura, Ralph H. Petrucci
Chemistry: The Central Science
14th Edition•ISBN: 9780134414232 (9 more)Bruce Edward Bursten, Catherine J. Murphy, H. Eugene Lemay, Matthew E. Stoltzfus, Patrick Woodward, Theodore E. Brown
Modern Chemistry
1st Edition•ISBN: 9780547586632 (2 more)Jerry L. Sarquis, Mickey SarquisMore related questions
1/4
1/7